[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e

Subject: Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
From: John <zzzjoki@yahoo.com>
Date: 25 May 2007 10:29:15 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <C27BC413.112FB%NoMoreSpam@haha.net>
Injection-info: x18g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.212.51.110; posting-account=InIDMwwAAACLZ3gpW5d6vXE1F8VsBdvN
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1MSdnUW5zPiN2svbnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@comcast.com> <C27BC413.112FB%NoMoreSpam@haha.net>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:26175

On May 24, 8:59 pm, "Hugh Hood" <hugh.h...@a2central.com.remove-6ip-
this> wrote:
>   To: Michael J. Mahon
> Fellas,
>
> AppleWorks 5.1 was a _major_ improvement from 3.0. Popularity doesn't equate
> to merit. Just ask Melinda Doolittle. <g>
>
> I still run 5.1 every day in my business with several custom macro sets
> doing very specific tasks. Quite simply, I'd say it's the best 8-bit
> software ever written.

 Duck. Wordstar? Dbase? Are those in the top 10?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
  - From: "Hugh Hood" <hugh.hood@a2central.com.remove-wj6-this>

References:
- Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>
- Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
  - From: "Hugh Hood" <hugh.hood@a2central.com.remove-6ip-this>

Prev by Date: Green Apple Small Carbon
Next by Date: Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
Previous by thread: Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
Next by thread: Re: AW5 vs WP 1.1 for 2e
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread