[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thanks to everyone in this group
- Subject: Re: Thanks to everyone in this group
- From: "magnusfalkirk" <dean.phares@gmail.com>
- Date: 8 Mar 2007 05:29:10 -0800
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- In-reply-to: <45f002fc$0$60337$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net>
- Injection-info: h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=68.90.153.23; posting-account=4WCM4w0AAABwpDCCEuvGc4zpGeyj0PAf
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <UAMHh.643$nV1.174@bignews6.bellsouth.net> <45f002fc$0$60337$c30e37c6@lon-reader.news.telstra.net>
- User-agent: G2/1.0
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:23765
On Mar 8, 6:34 am, Tristan Mumford <xtristan.xmumf...@xgmail.xcom>
wrote:
> Payton Byrd wrote:
> > I just wanted to say thanks to everyone in this group for pointing me in
> > the right direction on my new Apple II journey. I've successfully
> > upgraded my Apple IIe to an enhanced //e thanks to GSE Reactive. I've
> > successfully installed and am exploring new possibilities using the CFFA
> > card. I've downloaded a couple gigs of software that I'll probably never
> > get through 1/15th of that I'm finding to be a unique and interesting
> > experience to work with. I've even learned a thing or two about
> > electronics, digital circuits and other topics in this forum.
>
> > Classic computing holds the same potential for IT professionals
> > (especially programmers like myself) that history holds for political
> > scientists. We must learn to use and appreciate the past and realize that
> > the past holds lots of great value and applicability to today. Want
> > proof? My kids (5 and 3) love to play M.U.L.E. (C64), Ms. Pacman (Atari
> > 800xl), and Apple Presents Apple (duh). They both love the instant
> > gratification of typing a "letter" directly to the printer of my Adam.
> > Children are the proof that great products stand on their own merits
> > regardless of the advances of technology.
>
> I agree with everything you said.
> My two year old loves the c64 and IIe. And also a bare board PONG game etc.
>
> I think the saying that graphics does not make the game pretty much expands
> out to applications etc. People today seem to have trouble understanding
> that a fully featured word processor, graphics package or game can fit into
> a handful of kilobytes and can load faster than a multi-gigahertz monster
> can manage.
>
> Anyway yes, the past holds many lessons. And as I tend to say that it's
> every bit as good today as when it was made.
>
> Tristan.
> --
> ----->http://members.dodo.com.au/~izabellion1/tristan/index.html<-----
> ===== It's not pretty, it's not great, but it is mine. =====
Another thing with classic computing is that there seems to be a wider
variety of games to play for classic systems than there are for newer
ones, including consoles.
That's my two cents worth,
Dean