Re: The Apple 2 is rubbish !!!

["Sam Gillett" <samgillettnospam@diespammermsn.com>]

<spike1@freenet.co.uk> wrote ...

> Sam Gillett <samgillettnospam@diespammermsn.com> did eloquently scribble:
>
>> <a2fan@hotmail.com> wrote ...
>>>
>>> Ed Zagmoon wrote:
>>>> The Commodore 64 is much better, the Apple 2 is just
>>>> an oversized and expensive paperweight.
>>>
>>> You're right - the Commodore 64 is a MUCH better (more efficient), and
>>> cheaper paperweight.
>
>> The Sinclair Spectrum is an even better paperweight.  It is also a good
>> doorstop.
>
> Although nowhere near as good a doorstop as the commode64.
> It had the bulk and weight on its side.

Unless you had really strange doors, the Commodore 64 was too tall to wedge
under a door, as a proper doorstop should be wedged.  The Sinclair Rectrum
was a much better fit.  Besides, if you wedged it under the door upside down,
the rubber keyboard prevented it from slipping if a gust of wind attempted to
close the door.

> And if you were stretched for storage space, you could open it up and store
> your bread in it.

The Sinclair machines were perfect for storing used condoms, although I have
difficulty understanding why you Speccy girlies wanted to collect used
rubbers.
-- 
Best regards,

Sam Gillett

I saw Sir Clive making crop circles,
But they turned out square!!