Michael J. Mahon wrote: > The myth that a 65(C)02 "store instruction" accesses the target > twice is confusion resulting from the warning that the BASIC POKE > statement accesses the target twice--which it does because it is > an *indexed* store (as Nick pointed out). > > This is an example of why the Wikipedia concept is flawed. ;-) Ah, but your post is an example of why it's not :-) Matt