Re: //c system

["PZ" <skierpaul@yahoo.com>]

There were atleast 2 different versions of the ImageWriter II (standard
width).  One weighed about 8 lbs heavier than the other.  I don't know
if its the PS, or additional shielding, but one is a reasonable weight
and the other certainly isn't.

- Paul

Matthew Russotto wrote:
> In article <4519c86d$0$24167$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com>,
> Scott Alfter <scott@alfter.DIESPAMMERSDIE.us> wrote:
> >
> >It also weighs a ton, compared to most other dot-matrix printers.  Several
> >of the internal components are metal castings, instead of sheet-metal
> >stampings or plastic.  If the OP's printer really is an Imagewriter, it
> >should weigh more than any Apple II.
>
> You think the Imagewriter weighs a lot, try the Imagewriter 15"!  I
> don't think they ever made a Imagewriter II 15".
> --
>   There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
>   result in a fully-depreciated one.