[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C64/128 vs Apple -- Video?
- Subject: Re: C64/128 vs Apple -- Video?
- From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:22:23 +0200
- In-reply-to: <44a05174$0$26254$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Arcor
- References: <75xng.123172$dW3.43899@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <44a05174$0$26254$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317)
- Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9870
Linards Ticmanis wrote:
> Commodore doesn't use artifact color. Their circuit creates the chroma
> signal independently of the luma. So they are not bound to a n�3.58 MHz
> pixel clock. In Commodores, there are 7 (NTSC) or 9 (PAL) chroma cycles
> per 8 luma cycles.
Just to clear this up - I mean 7 or 9 steps of the internal state
machine (AFAIK that's the numbers), not 7 or 9 full periods of the wave.
--
Linards Ticmanis