[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pascal system

Subject: Re: pascal system
From: "mdj" <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
Date: 4 Jun 2006 17:58:31 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <7-mdnU4jTKyCyB7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@comcast.com>
Injection-info: h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=220.237.91.208; posting-account=W_jMEA0AAAAZdNaersJnc-7Hjv-SIC8Q
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <44803cdb$0$23286$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr> <1149262420.729390.314470@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <e5pnth$1499$1@merope.saaf.se> <kNOdnWuedvOlOR3ZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@comcast.com> <e5rv81$1udi$1@merope.saaf.se> <1149429794.448365.229870@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <7-mdnU4jTKyCyB7ZnZ2dnUVZ_vOdnZ2d@comcast.com>
User-agent: G2/0.2
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.sys.apple2:8815

Michael J. Mahon wrote:

> But, of course, you couldn't bind the new routines to infix operators,
> right?  Still had to use nested function calls to evaluate arithmetic
> expressions...  This is one of the great reasons to allow overloading
> operators.

That's right. It was a bit messy to use as a result. If there was a
need to do a really complex expression, it was better again to write
the whole expression as an assembly routine which was easy once you had
the source for the others

Matt

References:
- pascal system
  - From: "Guillaume Tello" <houten.van@wanadoo.fr>
- Re: pascal system
  - From: "Bill H" <bill@ts1000.us>
- Re: pascal system
  - From: pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)
- Re: pascal system
  - From: Alex Freed <alexf@mirrow.com>
- Re: pascal system
  - From: pausch@saaf.se (Paul Schlyter)
- Re: pascal system
  - From: "mdj" <mdj.mdj@gmail.com>
- Re: pascal system
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: BoycoT Chat System was down, but it's back up!
Next by Date: Re: pascal system
Previous by thread: Re: pascal system
Next by thread: Re: pascal system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread