[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BAM HPFS
- Subject: Re: BAM HPFS
- From: Gregory Weston <uce@splook.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:36:07 -0500
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <3cjVf.753$t22.146@dukeread08>
- User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5837
In article <3cjVf.753$t22.146@dukeread08>,
"Jack Tseng" <tseng4@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You know about Commodore 1541's BAM, and OS/2's HPFS. What is it called for
> Apple II ProDOS?
I only ever heard it called the ProDOS file system. I don't see any
specific name given in my copy of the ProDOS 8 Technical Reference
Manual.
> eariler MacOS 7.5 to 9???
The first Mac file system was MFS. M for Macintosh. Completely flat file
system with an illusion of hierarchy maintained by the UI.
In 1985 (System 3.2, IIRC) they introduced HFS. H for hierarchical.
Introduced a few other benefits, but also some new restrictions.
Probably the most annoying is that the maximum length of a file name was
cut in half.
Mac OS 8.1 brought HFS+. A whole raft of new features in the file
system, many of which weren't actually leveraged by the OS immediately.
The biggest benefit for most people was probably that they raised the
upper limit on the number of allocation blocks, which meant no more
half-meg grocery lists on large volumes. Some of them, in fact, only
used in the last couple of years.
--
"Congurutulation!!!" - The subject line on some spam I received recently.
I have no idea what it means, but it's such a cool "word" (by which I mean
pronouncable sequence of letters) regardless.
- References:
- BAM HPFS
- From: "Jack Tseng" <tseng4@hotmail.com>