[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: chips

Subject: Re: chips
From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:38:01 +0100
In-reply-to: <1h9xtqt.ug9vn3xpeo5fN%bieling@terra.es>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Arcor
References: <1137866341.748366.317430@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <ziggy-8CB972.09165122012006@netnews.asp.att.net> <7ribt1heb63pt7d544s953qaueak2v9dh8@4ax.com> <20060125151929296+1300@News.Individual.NET> <1h9xbg9.1hu8nqvpue2niN%bieling@terra.es> <43dcf1a5$0$4095$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net> <1h9xtqt.ug9vn3xpeo5fN%bieling@terra.es>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:3881

Jorge Chamorro Bieling wrote:

Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de> wrote:

You must be joking.


yes... was it the c64 then ?

Probably. The C64 has some of the same faults, such as badexpandability, weak BASIC and incompatibility with earlier models, butat least it came with 64K of RAM and its graphics and sound capabilitieswere indeed more advanced than those of the Apple.


--
Linards Ticmanis

References:
- chips
  - From: bob@coolgroups.com
- Re: chips
  - From: ziggy <ziggy@fakedaddress.com>
- Re: chips
  - From: "a2now@hnt.net" <A2Now>
- Re: chips
  - From: Roger Johnstone <news2006@roger.geek.nz>
- Re: chips
  - From: bieling@terra.es (Jorge Chamorro Bieling)
- Re: chips
  - From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@gmx.de>
- Re: chips
  - From: bieling@terra.es (Jorge Chamorro Bieling)

Prev by Date: Re: chips
Next by Date: Re: chips
Previous by thread: Re: chips
Next by thread: Re: chips
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread