[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?

Subject: Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
From: Peter van Merkerk <merkerk@deadspam.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:23:07 +0100
In-reply-to: <1135601178.453498.50970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.tandy, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm
Organization: Hobby Computer Club News Network
References: <1135598972.038067.292460@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <1135601178.453498.50970@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.sinclair:3572 comp.sys.tandy:822 comp.sys.atari.8bit:1535 comp.sys.apple2:2631 comp.sys.cbm:6526

Andrew Owen wrote:

Many mono displays were text only (which is very memory efficient). In
fact even on colour computers like the Commodore 64 there was usually a
mono text mode available.

Corection: all text/graphics modes on the C64 support (more than two)colors.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
  - From: "Sam Gillett" <samgillettnospam@diespammermsn.com>

References:
- Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
  - From: "Bill H" <bill@ts1000.us>
- Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
  - From: "Andrew Owen" <aoweninoz@yahoo.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
Next by Date: Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
Previous by thread: Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
Next by thread: Re: Crosspost: Did the cpu influence the display?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread