[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?

Subject: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
From: Alex Freed <alexf@mirrow.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:24:03 -0700
In-reply-to: <wcf*CoOQq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.mac.system, comp.sys.mac.apps
References: <1OIpe.17401$QX1.14703@fe06.lga> <3gr18rFcobl4U1@individual.net> <wcf*CoOQq@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:11884 comp.sys.mac.system:49090 comp.sys.mac.apps:24604

Tim Cutts wrote:


It's happened to Sun machines to.  Very early Sun workstations were
based on the i386 processor, and only later moved to SPARC, and then
again to UltraSPARC.


Early Sun used 68K CPUs, not x86.

References:
- How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: "Bible John" <john.doggett@x-files.gov>
- Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: Ilgaz Ocal <Ilgaz@spamcop.net>
- Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
  - From: Tim Cutts <timc@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Why still using Apple II?
Next by Date: Re: Enhance kit
Previous by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Next by thread: Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread