Re: How many times must Apple make such DRASTIC architecture changes?

[shamino@techie.com (David C.)]

Keeper of the Purple Twilight writes:
> Gregory Weston wrote:
>>
>> and you've forgotten the Apple III and the Apple IV. But there was
>> never, TTBOMK, any intention for the IV and V to retain any sort of
>> compatibility with the earlier models.
> 
> Since when was there ever actually such a thing as Apple IV and V?

I think Greg's being a bit silly with the names.

I've heard him on occasion refer to the Lisa as an "Apple IV" and the
first Macs as "Apple V".

Since the OP is making the (pretty silly) claim that Macs are some kind
of sequel to Apple-II's, I see no problem with being equally silly in
response.

-- David