[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple IIplus ROMs in original II?
- Subject: Re: Apple IIplus ROMs in original II?
- From: Jeff Lodoen <jmlodoen@thegrid.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:21:42 -0600
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <RsudneQFP4AKra7fRVn-3Q@comcast.com> <JE6Zd.10575$yp.7261@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <1110783459.eeb48cdb38a58be9d006e5851e2178ce@teranews> <sTeZd.831$Ue6.801@trndny04>
- User-agent: Xnews/5.04.25
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9437
Moll <MollyBaker@Spam.GMAIL.Spam.Spam.Spam.Com> wrote in
news:sTeZd.831$Ue6.801@trndny04:
> What would be nice is if an INTBASIC interpreter could be hacked so as
> not to interfere with ProDOS.
>
> I wonder if it could be done?
I always wanted to, but I'm no techie. ProDOS' major feature was use of
newer storage devices. Running AmDOS or UniDOS solved that for me.
DOS 3.3 on an 800K 3.5" with DiversiCache was nice.
Off topic... but The Byte Work sold an INTBASIC compiler for their ORCA
system on the IIGS. A curiousity piece really cause the "neat" INT stuff
used lots of PEEK, POKEs and CALLs and the compiler couldn't handle it.