[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple IIplus ROMs in original II?
- Subject: Re: Apple IIplus ROMs in original II?
- From: Paul Schlyter <pausch@saaf.se>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:29:54 +0100
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- References: <RsudneQFP4AKra7fRVn-3Q@comcast.com> <JE6Zd.10575$yp.7261@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> <1110783459.eeb48cdb38a58be9d006e5851e2178ce@teranews> <phbZd.56919$fc4.3626@edtnps89>
- User-agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:9438
In article <phbZd.56919$fc4.3626@edtnps89>, waynes@telus.dotnet says...
> Paul Schlyter wrote:
>
> > ProDos won't boot on an Apple II with Integer Basic ROM's on the
> > motherboard. And an Integer Basic ROM card won't help either since it
> > cannot coexist with a Language Card, and ProDos requires a Language Card
> > to be able to even boot.
>
> Huh? My integer basic Apple II happily boots early versions of ProDOS.
> I've booted Copy II Plus off a SCSI hard drive in my II. If I'd come up
> with an Integer Basic program selector I'd have left ther hard drive
> connected to the II.
>
> Later versions of ProDOS require 64k but the first version will run on
> 48k.
OK, I had forgot that some early ProDOS versions could run in 48K.
But you wouldn't be able to start the Basic System on a 48K machine
with Integer Basic in ROM. You could only make ProDOS autostart
some binary file which doesn't depend on Applesoft in ROM.
> I've always used a ROM card with a language card. They have nothing to
> do with each other aside from both using slots in the same machine.
...and mapping to the same RAM address space... :-)
> Wayne
>