Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!

Subject: Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
From: Supertopcheckerbunny <remove-this-lotek64-and-this@aon.at>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:00:04 +0200
In-reply-to: <BD93098B.18A5E%delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <BD8F8A50.17E86%delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com> <dapnm052b13ve6eopb153s1m0oov1i475m@4ax.com> <416befc1$1_4@127.0.0.1> <1psom09hl3hs4i333lp4ojhuplpk4q16di@4ax.com> <e9c909f5.0410130000.73ec11a@posting.google.com> <_fbbd.29395$QJ3.15492@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com> <BD93098B.18A5E%delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030619 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:5032

There's no point starting a new computer war, everyone knows that the
Macintosh G5 is way better than anything else.


But the Commodore 64 is *much* better than the Apple II anyway ;)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: RichardK-PB <atari@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>

References:
- Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: Richard Kilpatrick <delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: exegete@nunya.biz
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: Kevin <followthelink@bottomofpost.com>
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de (Marcus Heuser)
- Re: Iigs comparable to Amiga? Pah!
  - From: Richard Kilpatrick <delorean@NOSPAMbtconnect.com>