[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple ][ Forever?



Charles re-posted:

>In article <MPG.1b731619e7532519896a9@news.verizon.net>, 
>spammeister12345@aol.com says...
>> In article <7f7db0c3.0404091820.3a333430@posting.google.com>, 
>> jim_suttonus@yahoo.com says...
>> > EWING@YALEVM.BITNET (Rick Ewing) wrote in message
>news:<8707291034.aa25905@SMOKE.BRL.ARPA>...
>> > > Regarding the presumed "demise" of the Apple ][ series and lack of
>interest
>> > > from Apple Co.:  (part rebuttle, part *flame*)
>> > > 
>> > >      I don't know just *where* that you may be getting your information
>from,
>> > > but I can say that the death of the Apple ][ is completely and
>absolutely
>> > > **false**.

<snip>

>> > > on this forum:  Well, this is one Apple rep has been here since
>September of
>> > > last year. 
>> > 
>> > Huh? Who is that? They sure don't post very often.
>> > 
>> > >I agree that more should be here, but its completely untrue that
>> > > Apple isn't listening.  I include all major problems that I find in my
>reports
>> > > and try to track down answers for them if a can, especially in recent
>issues
>> > > such as ProDOS 00 trashing, the VGC bug, Finder development and the
>like.  I

This is a _very_ old post...

Ancient history.

-michael

Check out parallel computing for 8-bit Apples on my
Home page:  http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/