[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
In message <3ff98282$1_5@corp.newsgroups.com>, Exegete
<millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> writes
Well, there was the C-128....
Which offered very little more relative to the C64 than the Apple //e
and a Z80 card; most Apple systems were fitted with 80 column cards, and
the //c had 128K...
Richard
--
Richard Kilpatrick, long haired prophet of doom. |\ _,,,---,,_
Musical suicide - www.mp3.com/RichardKilpatrick /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,
Work: Icon Publications, Group Sales Manager |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'::.
Homepage: http://www.dmc12.demon.co.uk/ '----''(_/--' `-'\_)Morticia
- References:
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Mikael Ljungberg <mikael.ljungberg@telia.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Richard Kilpatrick <richard@dmc12.demon.co.uk>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>