Richard Kilpatrick wrote:
In message <3ff98282$1_5@corp.newsgroups.com>, Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> writesWell, there was the C-128....Which offered very little more relative to the C64 than the Apple //e and a Z80 card; most Apple systems were fitted with 80 column cards, and the //c had 128K...
But it was an improvement - more speed, more memory, 80 columns, more color too, right? No? Yes, it did take the C-64 to the level of a //e (at least), and it did have an improved CPU, but granted, it was certainly not a //gs.
Roy
Richard
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----