[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...

Subject: Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
From: "Salle Arobase" <salle.arobase@ville-rochefort.fr>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:51:30 +0200
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.os.cpm
Organization: Ville de Rochefort
References: <9307085f.0309091730.2dc406b@posting.google.com> <20030910021726.17885.00000962@mb-m05.aol.com> <9307085f.0309101737.1b2fef82@posting.google.com>
Reply-to: "Salle Arobase" <salle.arobase@ville-rochefort.fr>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:34854 comp.os.cpm:14254

Hello, "Dosius"!

Well, your message was quite difficult to understand,
or what you have in mind is so complex that I had difficulties
understanding it. If you are playing with CP/M on the Apple II,
may I remind you that the comp.os.cpm Newsgroup has 2
"experts" on it: John D. Baker, and Paul Schlyter.

> (I wonder if there's a "com2hex" type program...

I would suggest that you search Google Groups for the following:
"UNLOAD.BAS" in the comp.os.cpm Newsgroup...

There, you will find my UNLOAD.BAS and LOAD.BAS.

After reading them, I hope that you will understand why I
like CP/M smallness and simplicity.

Yours Sincerely,
"French Luser"

References:
- Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
  - From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)
- Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
  - From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
  - From: steve@dosius.zzn.com (Dosius)

Prev by Date: VDOS?
Next by Date: Re: VDOS?
Previous by thread: Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
Next by thread: Re: Emulating a Z80, and, So that's why CP/M 3.1 is so slow...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread