[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which Apple II?

Subject: Re: Which Apple II?
From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:12:49 -0400
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
References: <1fwytad.lp0glv2hl8d2N%jamiekg@e3.net.nz> <20030622190617249+1200@news.inv.ihug.co.nz> <vfbo406cm4otfb@corp.supernews.com> <3ef84b52_1@news.iprimus.com.au>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:31852

> > hard disk compared with the 160K on a 5.25" disk. The compactness and
> > elegance of the IIc/IIc+ makes them attractive, lack of slots is a
> downside.
>
> hey Paul,
>
> I'm sure you made a typo, but where are you getting the extra 20K on your
> 5.25s ?

Maybe he has the Wozn't made by Apple version. ;-)

Bill @ GarberStreet Enterprises };-)
Web Site - http://garberstreet.netfirms.com
Email - willy46pa@comcast.net



---
This email ain't infected, dude!

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.490 / Virus Database: 289 - Release Date: 6/16/03

References:
- Which Apple II?
  - From: jamiekg@e3.net.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet)
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: Roger Johnstone <rojaws@es.co.nz>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Paul Grammens" <grammens@svn.net>
- Re: Which Apple II?
  - From: "Mark Cummings" <NOTfigjams@primus.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Which Apple II?
Next by Date: Re: Which Apple II?
Previous by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Next by thread: Re: Which Apple II?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread