[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple II Interrupt card
- Subject: Re: Apple II Interrupt card
- From: mjmahon@aol.com (Michael J. Mahon)
- Date: 22 Mar 2003 20:18:03 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
- References: <TaYea.175620$F1.7071@sccrnsc04>
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:29064
In article <TaYea.175620$F1.7071@sccrnsc04>, "@nospam.01@attbi.com"
<""jsymolon\"@nospam.01@attbi.com"> writes:
>back to the original goal...
Yay! ;-)
>Assume that people want to run Contiki...
>
>Need:
>Ethernet card.
Not necessarily (but I see why you would want something other
than a serial port).
>Clock for those who don't have one.
Maybe not. If it is only for the purposes of timeout determination,
then a very approximate "timing" solution may suffice. But if you
have the real time, so much the better.
>Software:
>Contiki uses the uIP stack and works with a clock for timing.
>
>Discussion of interrupt card, mouse card or clock card to provide
>interrupts, even though Contiki does not need them.
>
>One problem is heavy traffic on the network. I've been reading the
>application note on the CS8900A in 8-bit mode. It does not support
>interrupts and must be polled. As long as there is enough time to
>handle each packet, we're ok.
And the loss of an occasional packet is not a problem, either--
that's what TCP was invented for, after all.
>I have no problem with interrupts, it does make some things easier to
>deal with.
And interrupts are obviously a source of great amusement for
many folks... ;-)
-michael
Check out amazing quality 8-bit Apple sound on my
Home page: http://members.aol.com/MJMahon/