[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari

Subject: Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
From: "Angelo" <jamesvigATT@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:06:40 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.amiga.hardware, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc
Organization: Cox Communications
References: <3D84D5E7.57435BB6@lafn.org> <slrnaomot0.168i.skipper@web1.calweb.com> <20020921120606393+1200@news.inv.ihug.co.nz> <slrnaopfai.24rb.skipper@web1.calweb.com> <amk1kj$qec$1@news.cc.tut.fi>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.atari.8bit:15214 comp.sys.cbm:42351 comp.sys.amiga.hardware:28409 comp.sys.apple2:23017 comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc:25914

"Ojala Pasi 'Albert'" <albert@pikkukorppi.cs.tut.fi> wrote in message
news:amk1kj$qec$1@news.cc.tut.fi...
> In article <slrnaopfai.24rb.skipper@web1.calweb.com>,
> Skipper Smith <skipper@no-spam.calweb.com> wrote:
> >Pin compatibility wasn't what made for the legal problems- it was the
> >duplication of the mask (which was trademarked)
>
> What mask are you talking about?
>
> I can not believe they were allowed to take the whole mask set of 6800
> when leaving the company, so you must be talking about something else.
>
> -Pasi
>

Who said they were "allowed"?
The whole snafu was that they "walked" out with
the goods. ;-)

            Jim

References:
- Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
  - From: skipper@no-spam.calweb.com (Skipper Smith)
- Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
  - From: Roger Johnstone <rojaws@es.co.nz>
- Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
  - From: skipper@no-spam.calweb.com (Skipper Smith)
- Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
  - From: albert@pikkukorppi.cs.tut.fi (Ojala Pasi 'Albert')

Prev by Date: Re: BoycoT Back up (if anyone cares)...
Next by Date: BBS telnet
Previous by thread: Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
Next by thread: Re: Amiga, Mac, Atari
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread