[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Transwarp or ZipGSX? Which?
- Subject: Transwarp or ZipGSX? Which?
- From: Blake Patterson <bwpatter@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 14:55:25 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: :noitazinagrO
- User-agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X)
- Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:21483
Ok...which is the better accelerator to work with?
Transwarp GS 7MHz + 32K cache
or
ZipGSX 8MHz + 16K cachce
??
Is the software, stability of one greater than the other? Also, I have
faith that both could run Ninjaforce's Megademo...
http://www.ninjaforce.com/html/products_megademo.html
...as I found this old usenet post by the author:
"The Ninjaforce MEGADEMO comes out on 2
3.5" disks and requires:
* 2 MEG of Expansion Memory
* A fast accelerator
(ZipChipGSX 8MHZ or better or
Transwarp GS 7MHZ with cache update or
better)
Please stay tuned."
I know both are hard to come by, but if presented the choice?
Thanks.
bp
--
Heisenberg may have slept here.