Re: The apple 2, the PC, and the clones

[Greg Weston <gwestonREMOVE@CAPSattbi.com>]

In article <20020714161044.03263.00000497@mb-bh.aol.com>, Supertimer
<supertimer@aol.com> wrote:

> Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
> 
> >>Supertimer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>Supertimer opined:
> >>>
> >>>I agree with your first sentance, but your second is nonsense. While 
> >>>Apple had a presence in the home, don't forget that the home is where 
> >>>the cheap computers ruled: Commodore, Atari, and where TI, Coleco, and 
> >>>Radio Shack sought to rule.
> >> 
> >> What I am saying is that those other cheap computers sucked.
> >> Of all the non-PC computers, only Apple could deliver productivity
> >> software like AppleWorks, WordPerfect, SuperCalc 3a, and VIP
> >> Professional.  
> >
> >Apple delivered only one of those products.
> 
> Apple only produced AppleWorks but what did IBM produce?

DisplayWrite.

G