Re: AOL? Do What?!

["John Oyler" <jojo4@mediaone.net>]

"Lord of the Flies" <python@ux1.cyberenet.net> wrote in message
3b4e84e7_1@news.eticomm.net">news:3b4e84e7_1@news.eticomm.net...
> Um, _no,_ I'm not so sure that that clears anything up at all.  In fact
> I'm a little confused: What in the hell do ISPs have to do with this
> subject anyway, muchless AOL?

Well, I know that you are probably metally retarded, but I believe in
mainstreaming. As such, I will try to instruct you as I would someone that
has a normal capacity for thought and learning.

AOL sucks ass.
10s of millions of people use AOL
Therefore, having more sales has nothing to do with whether the product is
good, bad, or in this case a monstrosity.

For instance, if sales were even indirectly based on the quality of a
product, AOL would have about 3 users at this point, one of which would be a
gibbon (studies have proven that chimpanzees, when faced with a choice in
internet service, will choose something that doesn't insult their
intelligence), George W. Bush (hey he has advisors for all the important
stuff anyway) and you.

> And were you aware that AOL wasn't always AOL?  It used to be a pre-inet
> on-line service called Q-Link.  And does anyone here know who it served,
> the reason for its existence?  Show of hands?  That's right everyone: the
> answer is Commodore Computers and their users.  And yes, Steve Case was
> there the whole time.

It would only figure, that Commodore is to blame. Yet another crime they
have inflicted on us all.

Die. Soon please.