Re: Asimov Site

["**** ****" <***@***.com>]

Frank Townsend wrote in message ...
>Of course the house is different, but that is irrelevant to the point that
>Jeff is making.
>
>Your arguments tend to be unpersuasive and/or irrelevant because they are
>not couched at the same level of abstraction as Jeff's.
>
>If you don't know what I mean, do a web search on Hayakawa's Abstraction
>Ladder.
>
>Property can be viewed as a "bundle of rights" which makes Jeff's analysis
>not only non-silly but perfectly sensible..


How can that which is fundamentally wrong, be a "right" ? In your defense, I
don't believe either you or Jeff do this out of malice. But you are using
circular logic. I say even if it's the law, it's "wrong". You say it's
"right". I ask why you think it's right, and you say because it's the law.
Explain to me why it should be a "right".

John