Re: A2 Trade/Swap ... site ...

[ljsilicon@aol.comSpamSUX (R.A.Guy)]

The DEAN, who knows it all ;) spewed...

>I don't have to.  The burden of proof is on anyone who wishes to
>distribute those titles to prove that they have been reclassified to
>allow legal distribution in that way.  If no proof is given that they
>have been reclassified, then the only information we, the authorites
>and the courts have to go on is the last written wishes of the
>copyright holder.  This would be the original copyright notice and
>software license agreement that was on those titles.

First of all, once again you are sticking your nose into other people's
business. The copyright holders sis not elect you the protector of their works.
You are only the protector of "your" works. As for the rest of your statement,
why is it ok for you to make a blanket statement about the copyrights of the
programs if you don't have a clue about the current status of the software?
And, as for your sweeping remarks about the copyright notice and license
agreement, only the copyright holder can initiate action in the court. Go back
to your newsgroup reader development....

LJSilicon
(.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.)
(:)(:) (.)(.) (:)(:) (.)(.)

I put the "FUN" back in dysfunctional!

Get paid to surf the web. Sign up for AllAdvantage.
http://www.AllAdvantage.com      Reference # iam663