[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moderation
- Subject: Re: Moderation
- From: lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu (John Lesher)
- Date: 1996/07/25
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Vanderbilt University School of Engineering, Nashville, TN, USA
- References: <4se4qs$44r@crl2.crl.com> <4sgdin$r3q@pink.lm.com> <4sgfmd$atr@blackice.winternet.com> <4sv62l$mmm@news.vanderbilt.edu> <4svbmf$qg7@blackice.winternet.com>
Nathan Mates (nathan@parka.winternet.com) wrote:
: In article <4sv62l$mmm@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
: John Lesher <lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
: >Nathan Mates (nathan@parka.winternet.com) wrote:
: >: In the rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated, the computer program
: >: handling the moderation allows posts to get through almost immediately
: >: if you're on the 'automoderated' list-- the moderators have decided
: >: that that person posts reasonably often enough, so their posts are
: >: approved automatically. (Should they abuse that, they can be moved to
: >: handmod)
: > So, a not-unreasonable question to ask is,
: > Which list would you be on, Mr. Mates?
: > 'Automoderated'? Or 'handmoderated'?
: Automod. The troublemakers have never bothered trying to show up
: and post their drivel, so there's no need to clean up after them.
Remember the time you jumped all over that guy's ass for
not liking Appleworks Classic and wanting to buy WordPerfect GS?
It wasn't so long ago, yet you seem to forget this.
As per my original suggestion, if we have a moderated Apple II
newsgroup, let's make sure it's moderated by someone who NEVER
gets involved with the flame wars.
I'm sure there's a few out there.....
Tilghman