[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moderation



In article <4sv62l$mmm@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
John Lesher <lesherjt@vuse.vanderbilt.edu> wrote:
>Nathan Mates (nathan@parka.winternet.com) wrote:
>:    In the rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated, the computer program
>: handling the moderation allows posts to get through almost immediately
>: if you're on the 'automoderated' list-- the moderators have decided
>: that that person posts reasonably often enough, so their posts are
>: approved automatically. (Should they abuse that, they can be moved to
>: handmod)

>	So, a not-unreasonable question to ask is,
>	Which list would you be on, Mr. Mates?
>	'Automoderated'?  Or 'handmoderated'?

   Automod. The troublemakers have never bothered trying to show up
and post their drivel, so there's no need to clean up after them.

Nathan Mates
--
<*> Nathan Mates http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~nathan/      <*>
# What are the facts? Again and again and again-- what are the _facts_?
# Shun wishful thinking, avoid opinion, care not what the neighbors
# think-- what are the facts, and to how many decimal places?  -R.A. Heinlein