[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: pyoung@du.edu (P.C. Young)
- Date: 1995/09/11
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.misc, comp.sys.next.misc, comp.sys.sgi.misc, comp.sys.sun.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup, comp.windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc
- Organization: University of Denver
- References: <welston-0409951915480001@blv-pm10-ip25.halcyon.com> <42ghu1$rra@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <42igbh$hrk@news1.deltanet.com>
In article <42igbh$hrk@news1.deltanet.com>, fuz@deltanet.como says...
>Win95 is a great improvement over Win3.1. It is still garbage, but it is a
>lot closer to what it should be. Had they been able to make these kind of
>interface changes over the fairly solid core of NT, and have it be
compatible,
>
>Scott
>
It's a different OS, Scott. Legacy stuff bogs down in NT because nothing is
allowed direct access to the hardware except the OS. It's a mini network
inside your computer. Do you really think they should have made it like the
Power Mac software? No backward compatibility? Mac GUI for apps they haven't
even written yet? Come on! Get REAL!
--Pedro