[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: dialtone95@aol.com (DialTone95)
- Date: 1995/09/04
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.misc, comp.sys.next.misc, comp.sys.sgi.misc, comp.sys.sun.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup, comp.windows.misc, comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc
- Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
- References: <welston-0409951915480001@blv-pm10-ip25.halcyon.com>
- Reply-to: dialtone95@aol.com (DialTone95)
- Sender: root@newsbf02.news.aol.com
It sure seems like the people who rip Win 95 the most are MAC users.. if
it sucks so bad then what the hell are you so worried about? The fact that
there is such a backlash of Mac users against Win 95 makes me believe that
Win 95 is a lot closer to Mac 95 than Mac '87 as so many people say.. If
Microsoft would have just released DOS 4.0 I highly doubt there would be
even so much as a whisper coming from the Mac community.. but since they
released something which seems to have created such a big backlash with
Mac users it would seem to point that Win 95 is a lot closer to Mac 95
than Mac users would like to believe.
DialTone95@aol.com
--> WARNING <--
I am NOT a normal AOL loser. Please do not assume just because I have
@aol.com after my name that I am an idiot. Thank you for your
understanding. :)
Quote: Give me 30 minutes and I'll give you a half hour.