[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be



In article <42ghu1$rra@newsbf02.news.aol.com>,
   dialtone95@aol.com (DialTone95) wrote:
>It sure seems like the people who rip Win 95 the most are MAC users.. if
>it sucks so bad then what the hell are you so worried about? The fact that
>there is such a backlash of Mac users against Win 95 makes me believe that
>Win 95 is a lot closer to Mac 95 than Mac '87 as so many people say.. If
>Microsoft would have just released DOS 4.0 I highly doubt there would be
>even so much as a whisper coming from the Mac community.. but since they
>released something which seems to have created such a big backlash with
>Mac users it would seem to point that Win 95 is a lot closer to Mac 95
>than Mac users would like to believe.

Well, DOS 4 did not have a multi million dollar advertising budget.  Win95 is 
about as "in-your-face" as any software product has been in recent memory - 
there were even segments on the news about it, and the people buying it, using 
it, throwing it away, raving about it, etc.

Win95 is a great improvement over Win3.1.  It is still garbage, but it is a 
lot closer to what it should be.  Had they been able to make these kind of 
interface changes over the fairly solid core of NT, and have it be compatible, 
then it might well have moved out of the dreck category, but they could not, 
at least not while missing the deadline by no more than a year and a half as 
they did.

Scott

Scott Ellsworth          fuz@deltanet.com
"When a great many people are unable to find work, unemployment
results" - Calvin Coolidge, (Stanley Walker, City Editor, p. 131 (1934))
"The barbarian is thwarted at the moat." - Scott Adams