[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: dil.admin@mhs.unc.edu (David I. Laudicina)
- Date: 1995/09/06
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.s
- Organization: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- References: <welston-0409951915480001@blv-pm10-ip25.halcyon.com> <42ghu1$rra@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <G.Vaughn-0409952337390001@slip-31-7.ots.utexas.edu>
>I'll have to agree that Micro$loth is much better at marketing than Apple,
>but I still believe that Apple has more ingenuitive ideas and better
>programmers. If Apple plays its cards right, it can actually benefit from
>Win95. Since so many users will have to buy new hardware to run it, then
>maybe Apple can sway them to Macs. After all, since all of the reviews of
>Win95 comment on how it is more Mac-like, then maybe Apple can convince
>people to go ahead a buy the real thing since they need new hardware and
>new versions of software to actually use Win95.
>--
Oh I see if you are a current MAC 68xxx your not going to have to buy a new
machine (PowerPC) to really take advantage of 7.5 (still cooperatively multi
tasking) and 8.0 which starts to take on the capabilities of 95. If your win
3.1 machine has 8 meg you can run win 95 quite nicely.
Thx Dave L