Re: Re(2): ][C+ $200

[shack@crash.cts.com (Randy Shackelford)]

In article <33vpln$17p@gap.cco.caltech.edu>,
Nathan Mates <nathan@cco.caltech.edu> wrote:

>   If the switch on the //c+ just changes whether the chip runs at 1 o
>4 Mhz, dropping in a 4+Mhz 65802 should work, as you can underclock a
>chip without too much problem. But, if it's something like the ZipChip,
>where there's support circuitry on the microprocessor, things can get
>very bad.

I remember seeing under the hood at Applefest when they were introduced and
it appeared it had a regular 65C02. I think Apple would find it easier to build
a faster machine than build some kind of Zip thingy. I would expect a 65802 to
swap right in.
--
Randy Shackelford                                Huh huh, that was cool.
shack@crash.cts.com