[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)

Subject: Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)
From: shack@crash.cts.com (Randy Shackelford)
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 1994 08:23:04 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: CTS Network Services (CTSNET/crash), San Diego, CA
References: <1994Apr12.110558.22426@csc.canberra.edu.au> <1994Apr12.125938.9329@pro-novapple.clark.net>
Sender: news@crash.cts.com (news subsystem)

In article <1994Apr12.125938.9329@pro-novapple.clark.net>,
Lee Raesly <lee@pro-novapple.clark.net> wrote:
>No, ProDOS has ALWAYS required 64 K. It loads part of itself onto the
>Language card's  16 K.

So does that mean that my ProDOS Technical Reference Manual which shows the 
memory map of a 48K machine running ProDOS and the tech note that says that
version 1.1 is the first version that won't run in 48K are wrong?
--
Randy Shackelford                                "That's right, keep dancing
shack@crash.cts.com                               on the minefield"
                                                                  -Al Bundy

References:
- Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)
  - From: u901841@student.canberra.edu.au (Hickey / Michael Gerard (ISE))

Prev by Date: Re: Very Sad, but Appears True
Next by Date: Re: System 601 Finder
Previous by thread: Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)
Next by thread: Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread