Re: who still uses DOS 3.3 (was Apple DES program)

[u901841@student.canberra.edu.au (Hickey / Michael Gerard (ISE))]

In article <Cnsy69.CD6@crash.cts.com> shack@crash.cts.com (Randy Shackelford) writes:
[chomp]

>If you can dig up a copy of ProDOS 1.0 you can run it on a 48K machine. I have 
>a ][ that I'm trying to patch up and when I get it running I'm gonna try that.
>The only thing is BASIC requires 64K to run but that's moot in an integer-only
>machine.
>Randy Shackelford                                "That's right, keep dancing

Randy,

The label on my brand-spankin'-new ProDOS 1.0 (only used _once_ by a little 
old lady to boot BASIC after Church on Palm Sunday, 1982) 

"For Apple //e and 64K II+" 

Was there a ProDOS 0.9 that only used 48K (Maybe Apple was lying! hmmmm 
wouldn't be the _first_ time ;-)

Michael