[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DMA at 2.8 MHz?
In article <1993May18.122045.9632@desire.wright.edu> avogan@desire.wright.edu writes:
>In article <1993May14.120834.14292@actrix.gen.nz>, dempson@swell.actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) writes:
>> In article <m0ntXWq-00009QC@crash.cts.com> ncp@gnh-cathouse.cts.com (Neal Pitts) writes:
>>> Wait, let me understand this - DMA should be done at 1 MHz because of backward
>>> compatability with the IIe or because it's safer to let DMA happen at 1 MHz?
>>> If it's for backward compatability, the Rev. D RamFAST only works on the GS
>>> anyway...
>>
> Actually you will find that you cannot do DMA above 1Mhz, period. If it
>were possible I would have done it on the RamFAST.
>.................[Stuff deleted]
> Now it is possible to transfer data faster than 1 meg/sec. You have to
>get access to the processor environment. You can either replace the processor
>with a circuit (like the Zip does) or if you have a Zip in place you can
>get access to the processor environment via the expansion header on the card.
>Note that the TWGS is not capable of giving up the processor environment. That
>little header on the TWGS is not an expansion header like they claim. It is
>actually used to attach a test circuit. If you use the expansion of the Zip
>you need to pull the RDY signal to the CPU and then bus enable. This allows
>you to push your address and data onto the bus and transfer data at 2.8
>meg/sec. Actually 2.6 meg/sec with the refresh. No big sweat.
> Drew
OK, any chance of a special version of the RAMFast for IIGS owners with
a ZIPGS that goes via the ZIPGS expansion slot?
I realise this is a very limited market, but it would be great!
--
Email: johnmac@fawlty.towers.oz.au Phone: +61 2 427 2999
Snail: John MacLean c/- Tower Technology Fax: +61 2 427 7072
1 Apollo Place, Home: +61 2 449 5930
Lane Cove, NSW 2066, Australia.