[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vernier Universal Interface

Subject: Re: Vernier Universal Interface
From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
Date: 8 Apr 2006 17:22:09 -0700
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <zuudnYBDTdfU2qXZ4p2dnA@comcast.com>
Injection-info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.39.131.1; posting-account=maGggg0AAAAK9xaJv3N4k314iAb7_L6i
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1144460504.334418.281330@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <3PudnQflrqi-HarZnZ2dnUVZ_sCdnZ2d@comcast.com> <4437E430.6040203@spurgeon.net> <zuudnYBDTdfU2qXZ4p2dnA@comcast.com>
User-agent: G2/0.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:6223

> So lowering the resolution cuts the bandwidth by lowering the info
> content, while "plaining" the background concentrates all the bandwidth
> on the information content.

And using complex backgrounds maximizes the demand for bandwith and
storage space which in the long run leads us to better systems at the
providers, telcos and in home systems.

I guess its a perspective thing...

;o)

bye
Marcus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vernier Universal Interface
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

References:
- Vernier Universal Interface
  - From: grent@comcast.net
- Re: Vernier Universal Interface
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>
- Re: Vernier Universal Interface
  - From: Mike Spurgeon <mike@spurgeon.net>
- Re: Vernier Universal Interface
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Softcard Flakyness
Next by Date: Unknown Apple II board: "FLY BD"
Previous by thread: Re: Vernier Universal Interface
Next by thread: Re: Vernier Universal Interface
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread