[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!

Subject: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>
Date: 1 Apr 2006 07:55:29 -0800
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
In-reply-to: <1143906324.297021.128670@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Injection-info: u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.110.208.10; posting-account=N5hIbA0AAACzTGVDiZh9ucUYdzqr6aq7
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <1143905384.286995.27780@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com> <442e9f09$0$58113$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <1143906324.297021.128670@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/0.2
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:6024

Odd.  According to this website, it was a custom 65c02...  This makes
no sense to me.

http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/650x/Rockwell-338-6503%20(65C02).html

Surely there must be something different between this custom chip and a
stock 65c02.  My injured zip chip is seemingly much more compatible
than this thing.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: Eric Smith <eric@brouhaha.com>

References:
- Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: Don Bruder <dakidd@sonic.net>
- Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
  - From: "BLuRry" <brendan.robert@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Next by Date: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Previous by thread: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Next by thread: Re: Enhanced //e with a 6503??!
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread