Re: Test: the cycle

[Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net>]

On 17 fév, 15:49, "ict@ccess" <gids...@sasktel.net> wrote:
>
> Nooooooo!  Please prefer my code. :)
>
> I agree with you that your way is the right way.
>
> And on a discussion point of view, my understanding was that the goal
> was to keep the ACC free.
>
> I don't want to get into the hardware aspect of this discussion of
> what happens to the hardware when the bits get changed in this
> register.
>
> So as a final note I am making a disclaimer.
>
> Use my way at your own risk!  :)

:-)
OK OK, I missed the accumulator-free request!

PHA
SEC
JSR IDROUTINE ($FE1F)
BCS notiigs:

PHP
SEI
LDA #%1000_0000
TRB CYAREG ($C036)
PLP

notiigs:
PLA
xx
xx

===

I like the carry way :-)
av