[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Q: 6503 processor in Enhanced //e (platnum)?

Subject: Re: Q: 6503 processor in Enhanced //e (platnum)?
From: david@uow.edu.au (David Wilson)
Date: 7 Mar 2001 14:58:24 +1100
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: University of Wollongong
References: <20010306205925.06794.00000194@nso-cp.aol.com>
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.sys.apple2:6458

mirageeso@aol.com (MirageESO) writes:
>make sure they work.  I noticed there are "6503" processors in a few of these
>instead of a "65C02".  I mothballed my //e before the Platnum came out and I
>haven't been following the Apple line closely in all those years.  Could some
>one (or more) tell me what the differences are between the '65C02" and this
>"6503" are?  Apple Diagnostics 2.1 sees it as an Enhanced //e either way.

In an Apple //, any 6503 you find is just a 65C02 with an Apple part number.

A real 6503 only has 28 pins.
--
David Wilson  School of IT & CS, Uni of Wollongong, Australia

References:
- Q: 6503 processor in Enhanced //e (platnum)?
  - From: mirageeso@aol.com (MirageESO)

Prev by Date: Re: Problem with Apple //e boot ... help?
Next by Date: Re: TransWarp ][: any info?
Previous by thread: Re: Q: 6503 processor in Enhanced //e (platnum)?
Next by thread: About the CMS SCSI II (Ver.90/03/01)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread