Don't Call me Susan!

["Quantum_Cat" <anonymous@cotse.com>]

Salutations, O Pathetic Postal Pirate!

My!  This IS a GEM!

 *>Bev wrote in response to her misinformation and libel post 
content and
 *>public statement - claiming that 'Tom IS Susan'.

 *><<Nope, Tom. I've seen you do it half a dozen times. 
Others tipped me off to
 *>it.>>

Well, how else do you think Tom could get an appreciative 
audience?  :)

 *>Bev, I'm sick of you and other people spewing false 
information on this
 *>newsgroup about me.  Prove your claim with valid 
information and not with
 *>your delusions, misinformation and twisted gossip you 
obtain from others.
 *>You will not be able to - because such proof does not 
exist.

Oh oh... Tom is getting steamed...  And not only that, he's 
demanding PROOF!  Something he never provides to US.  :)

I am amazed on how much verbosity Tom can wring out of the 
statement "Tom IS Susan"...  I shudder to consider what he 
would be capable of if someone called him.... Jill.  Or 
Nancy.  :)

 *>Admit you were incorrect and wrong on this matter.  Or 
don't you have the
 *>capacity to admit you are ever wrong about anything???

I'll admit that you fessed up to an error, Tom.  A really 
stupid one that still makes me chuckle... ftp.apple.com dumps 
Apple II files... Heh heh...

You're a big man, Charles.  At least your ego is...

 *>Otherwise you WILL find a law suit in the works against 
you by me.  Got it? 

Wow!  Now the Dorktor REALLY loses it!

 *>Beleive me I'm very sincere when I say that Bev!  So, if 
you want to go that
 *>route - I'd advise you to get those people you refer to - 
( "I've seen you
 *>do it half a dozen times. Others tipped me off to it.")  - 
all together and
 *>ready as your court witnesses to testify on your behalf - 
as you will indeed
 *>be a defendant in a civil legal action - I fully intend to 
institute against
 *>you, ASAP.

I can see it now:

"Your Honor.  Bev called me... Susan!  The horror!  I'm 
scarred for LIFE!  I want you to reprimand her ASAP!"  *
chuckle*

 *>Retract your incorrect statements and ALL misinformation 
you have posted to
 *>the public about me promptly!  You have been warned.

So... Since all MY statements are the truth, I can let them 
stand?  Coolness!

 *>Like I said before -> I am not Susan.  I am Tom.  I always 
post with my REAL
 *>identity and name -> have NEVER posted in any other way on 
the Usenet.  
 *>That's the absolute truth of the matters. 

LOL!  Dorktor "Tom"?  That's real?  And I'm sorry to be the 
one to tell you this, Charles, but folks rarely believe known 
liars.  Sad but true.

 *>Nobody can prove otherwise.  Those are the facts Bev.  
Deal with it. Face

We KNOW we can't prove that you don't post under other 
assumed names, Tom.  Proving the negative is generally 
impossible.  Therefore, we are at a standstill.  On the 
Internet, no one knows you're a dog, and all.

Still, there are folks out there with Turdley Detectors who 
can sniff out the stench of Tom.

 *>reality LADY.  You were WRONG.  Admit it or face the music 
in court. Retract
 *>your statement: 'Tom is Susan' or legal action will occur.

Let me give you some free legal advice, doofus.  You're 
unlikely to win a case of mistaken identity.  But the judge 
might rule you a nuisance and general nudnik and remand you 
to a mental hospital for bringing suit.  :)

 *>Rest assured, I'm completely feed up with the compounded 
collective of

"feed up"?  Heh..

 *>misinformation and false conclusions you have been 
presenting about me on
 *>this newsgroup in the past with your postings to this 
comp.sys.apple2 Usenet
 *>news group.  I will not tolerate it.

Whew.. And this compounded collective of misinformation and 
false conclusions was packed neatly in the words "Tom IS 
Susan".  LOL!

And why do false conclusions bother you so much, Dorktor?  
You've been spewing your typical "Take this software!  It's 
free!" for years, even though you know it's a lie.

 *>If you do not have conclusive proof of what you post 
relating to me 'Charles
 *>T. turley' - then I advise you not to post it.  If you do, 
you will have to
 *>present conclusive proof to back up anything you do post 
relating to me in a
 *>civil court action, before a Judge and/or jury.  And, that 
ain't a threat -
 *>it's a promise.

No Tom, it's not a promise.  It's a statement of lunacy.  :)

 *>I have a very good lawyer and I have both the assets, time 
and desire to
 *>take you to civil trial over your incorrect information 
concerning me that
 *>you posted about this matter of your posted words:

Oxymoron, Charles... "Good Lawyer" ... :)

Too bad your assets don't include morals and intelligence.  
:)

 *>'Tom is Susan'.

*giggle*!  I can't HELP it!  I'd love to see the odd looks 
Tom got when he went before the jury and uttered those "foul" 
words... :D

 *>Again, I'll state this to the general public for the 
record.  I am not
 *>posting to any newsgroup on the Usenet (or anywhere else - 
in any manor) in
 *>the name of Susan Olson nor in any other name - anonymous 
or other than in
 *>my own name and real identity.  I never have and I never 
will.  If I have
 *>something to say, I say it with my real name and identity 
for the record.

Gee... you've lied "for the record", Dorktor... Why should we 
believe you now?

For the record, I don't believe you.  :)

 *>Awaiting your reply.

I'm certainly stunned that Bev found such a concise and swift 
means of getting Chuck to go postal.  I wish I'd thought of 
it!

 *>Sincerely, Tom

See ya... Susan.  :D

Vogons For a Turlette Free Apple II Community!

Quantum_Cat


-- 
Anon news web interface.  FAQ available for review at:
http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi