Re: KFest '97

["Dan Yertzell" <Dan-Yertzell@worldnet.att.net>]

james keim <jkeim@unlinfo.unl.edu> wrote in article
<5slbjb$p8q@crcnis3.unl.edu>...
> Dan Yertzell (DanY@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
> : Brian Hammack <brian.hammack@rook.wa.com> wrote in article
> : <1592702460-970808054700@rook.wa.com>...
> : >  JUE(| Nathan,  in all fairness, this is a little too caustic for a
> : >      | reply.  Unless, you are replying to some Dan Yertzell knowing
> : >      | that he has been involved with some pirating (which is not
> : >      | apparent from your post) then tone it down and be civil.
> : > 
> 
> : Say What?  What "piracy" have I been involved with in the past?  Be
> : specific and include your evidence, please.  The accusations by
children
> : don't constitute proof, however.
> 
> Dan--
>      Slow down and read a little more carefully.  I did not say you 
> were involved in priracy and Nathan's post did not either.  I simply 
> said that Nathan's response was out of line unless he was responding 
> to such a situation.  I was speaking in your behalf asking people to 
> be civil.  I was talking in the hypothetical.  _If_ you were involved 
> with piracy the response might be appropriate.  I could not see any 
> other context in which it would be appropriate.  However, your 
> response,
> 
> 

OOOPPSS!

I read this several times and couldn't see any other meaning but that you
were using my name as an example of a "known pirate".  If this was not your
intent, then I apologize for my previous rant.  The way things have been
around here lately, I think you can understand my reaction.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled flamefest, already in
progress.  :-)

Dan