[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copy2plus woes
- Subject: Re: Copy2plus woes
- From: Rubywand <rubywand@swbell.net>
- Date: 1997/05/30
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Southwestern Bell Internet Services
- References: <5mipdc$2fs@news.ysu.edu> <5miua6$1sn$1@darla.visi.com>
Nathan Mates writes ...
>
> > ....
> > copy2plus version 9 has such a user-unfriendly exit?
>
> If it's anything ilke its HD-destroying capabilities, I'd say it's
> blatant disregard for Apple's rules, and yet another reason NOT to use
> it.
>
Yes; even version 9.1 is fairly buggy. It does not like RAM disk and
it is not reliable for copying DOS 3.3 files. Letting a program like this
mess with your hard disk is asking for trouble. About the only reason to
keep the last Copy ][+ is for doing file compares.
> Copy ][+ was neat in its day. That day has passed. DON'T USE IT
> ON ANY HD OR DISK WITH EXTENDED FILES ON IT.
>
Naturally; however, Copy ][+ 8.3 is, still, very nice for moving
stuff around among DOS and ProDOS diskettes and RAM disk, especially if a
user does not want to boot System 6 with the 5.25" driver installed.
Rubywand