Re: NadaNet 3.1 Released

[Greg Buchner <null@none.invalid>]

In article <e-CdnUXpSfjnoZbRnZ2dnUVZ7tmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
 "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@garberstreet.com> wrote:

> "Greg Buchner" <null@none.invalid> wrote in message 
> null-80D2F6.23144305062010@free.teranews.net">news:null-80D2F6.23144305062010@free.teranews.net...
> > In article <MKqdnR4NjuUVUJfRnZ2dnUVZ7sidnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@garberstreet.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> HDTV???, I don't need no stinkin' HDTV.  LOL
> > 
> > Yea, that's what I thought until I got an HDTV. Took about a month 
> > before I was no longer even checking the SD channels to see if anything 
> > was on. HD channels only or it's not on...
> 
> Greg, I don't even have a TV service. I watch Free TV.   8^) 

Well, I'll bloody well admit that I have been thinking of going to just 
he basic package for cable and dropping a majority of the channels. I'm 
really don't think it's worth it anymore.  I figure I'm at $3/channel 
for what I watch. And some of those are only watched once or twice a 
week, if there's a new show on.

But, with Comcast (at least in my area), high-speed Internet by itself 
is about the same price as high-speed Internet with basic cable. Would 
like to just to the high-speed Internet, but might as well get the basic 
channels if it's the same price.

Greg

-- 
Actual e-mail address is gregbuchner and I'm located at gmail.com