[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NadaNet 3.1 Released




"Greg Buchner" <null@none.invalid> wrote in message null-ABB7BF.09075306062010@free.teranews.net">news:null-ABB7BF.09075306062010@free.teranews.net...
In article <e-CdnUXpSfjnoZbRnZ2dnUVZ7tmdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Bill Garber" <willy46pa@garberstreet.com> wrote:

"Greg Buchner" <null@none.invalid> wrote in message null-80D2F6.23144305062010@free.teranews.net">news:null-80D2F6.23144305062010@free.teranews.net...
> In article <MKqdnR4NjuUVUJfRnZ2dnUVZ7sidnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@garberstreet.com> wrote:
> >> HDTV???, I don't need no stinkin' HDTV. LOL > > Yea, that's what I thought until I got an HDTV. Took about a month > before I was no longer even checking the SD channels to see if anything > was on. HD channels only or it's not on...

Greg, I don't even have a TV service. I watch Free TV. 8^)

Well, I'll bloody well admit that I have been thinking of going to just he basic package for cable and dropping a majority of the channels. I'm really don't think it's worth it anymore. I figure I'm at $3/channel for what I watch. And some of those are only watched once or twice a week, if there's a new show on.

But, with Comcast (at least in my area), high-speed Internet by itself is about the same price as high-speed Internet with basic cable. Would like to just to the high-speed Internet, but might as well get the basic channels if it's the same price.

For me, High-Speed Internet and Digital Voice were the same price as just the Internet alone. Bill