[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zip GS - more speed or more cache - which is better?
- Subject: Re: Zip GS - more speed or more cache - which is better?
- From: sebugg@presby.edu (Stephen Buggie)
- Date: 1995/06/01
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Presbyterian College, Clinton, South Carolina USA
- References: <3pr8c3$nua@wraith.cs.uow.edu.au>
In article <3pr8c3$nua@wraith.cs.uow.edu.au>,
David E A Wilson <david@wraith.cs.uow.edu.au> wrote:
>Has anyone used more than one version of the ZipGS and can you answer the
>question "Is a larger cache a more cost effective upgrade than a higher
>processor speed?". For example, the 7MHz 32KB ZipGS costs about $159 while
>the 8MHz 16KB ZipGS costs $189. Is it worth the extra $30 to get a smaller
>cache but a faster clock speed?
>--
>David Wilson Dept CompSci Uni Wollongong Australia david@cs.uow.edu.au
I b
I bought the 3/72 model and it crashes some but not all the time. I called
ZIP tech support and they told me tgo reseat the chips ---- which I did ---
but its back to krashin' time again. Krashed twice tonight so far.
Nasty crashes too --- sudden crash into the monitor and all data are lost.
Reboot from scratch.
Since it is only a week old, I will ship it back tomorrow.
**=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=**
** S. Buggie sebugg@presby.edu IIe/IIc Ph: (803) 833-8337, 833-1632 **
**=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=**
.
S