[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ZipGS Tech. Question
- Subject: Re: ZipGS Tech. Question
- From: fadden@uts.amdahl.com (Andy McFadden)
- Date: 23 Aug 93 20:58:20 GMT
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
- References: <259do2$3f9@reeve.research.aa.wl.com>
In article <259do2$3f9@reeve.research.aa.wl.com> schultp@aa.wl.com (Paul Schultz) writes:
>Could someone explain the DATA and TAG cache memory designations
>on the ZipGS card? Why did my card come with one (TAG or DATA, I
>can't remember which right now) with slower SRAM chips than the
>other? I believe the TAG had 70ns chips and the DATA had 45ns
>chips when I got it.
Dunno. My 8MHz ZipGS had 70ns for one and 90ns for the other. I ordered
some 85ns parts to bring it up to 64K and they've worked just fine, though
I probably can't increase the clock rate.
>Internet: schultp@pd-dom.wl.com
--
fadden@uts.amdahl.com (Andy McFadden)
[ Above opinions are mine, Amdahl has nothing to do with them, etc, etc. ]