[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MS-DOS FST?

Subject: Re: MS-DOS FST?
From: Jim Murphy <murph@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 3 May 1993 19:26:48 GMT
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Apple Computer, Inc.
References: <1993Apr28.000007.13722@osl.or.gov> <C69zBz.3LK@rice.edu> <jmk3.736151123@crux1.cit.cornell.edu> <1993Apr29.032625.24996@wl.com>
Sender: news@gallant.apple.com

In article <1rp75k$dni@altitude.HIP.CAM.ORG> Phillip Vandry,
vandry@CAM.ORG writes:
>Not that resources should exist in the first place.. nothing but
problems,
>a stupid idea from Apple.

     Excuse me, but that's a rather baseless and ignorant statement. Just
because you don't understand how they work or how to implement them
doesn't mean they are useless. Resources have a myriad of uses, as others
have pointed out.

Jim Murphy        Apple II System Software Engineer        murph@apple.com

"It's a perfect day for kiss and swell,	                          The Cure
  for rip-zipping button-popping kiss and well..."       Doing the Unstuck

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: vandry@CAM.ORG (Phillip Vandry)

References:
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: visitor@ednet1.osl.or.gov (Compass Guest)
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: jimwong@owlnet.rice.edu (Jim Wong)
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: jmk3@crux3.cit.cornell.edu (Jay Krell)
- Re: MS-DOS FST?
  - From: schultp@wl.com (Paul Schultz)

Prev by Date: Re: Apple II still alive?
Next by Date: Re: What is WinFlate?
Previous by thread: Re: MS-DOS FST?
Next by thread: Re: MS-DOS FST?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread