[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?

Subject: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
From: heuser.marcus@freenet.de
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=213.39.148.121; posting-account=FHvUlwoAAABn6gtoNoDlSo_e2-kujPaB
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <0d224663-1203-4ad5-b2b4-c026780a944c@l6g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <15379068-b7c5-4937-83a4-80b862bf950d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <13ngjv8q3vqptc0@corp.supernews.com> <4779156b$0$19308$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com> <e4048e28-55d2-4eed-86ed-46be52e5a285@y5g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.cbm:43381 comp.sys.apple2:31545

On Dec 31, 7:00 pm, David Murray <adri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> However, it has very little "personality"  Just look at Apple
> BBS's of the time to see what I mean.  All plain ASCII, no
> color graphics.

Monochrome text mode = no personality?

Now that's a funny equation...

> The users of one computer were a totally different crowd
> from the other machine, with totally different interests.

Ack.

bye
Marcus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Steven Lichter <diespammers@ikillspammers.com>

References:
- C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Harry Potter <maspethrose7@aol.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Pheuque <Ratteler@gmail.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: Cameron Kaiser <ckaiser@floodgap.com>
- Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
  - From: David Murray <adric22@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Next by Date: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Previous by thread: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Next by thread: Re: C64/128 vs. Apple2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread